Always, many thanks to you Treena. I do find this ironic that he continues to beat that horse and it’s dead, dead, dead. Yet he is not satisfied with David Nathan’s response; or perhaps by using a laser beam light on specifics that he picks and chooses it will keep the light off of Jacob and his many errors? We don’t get to pick and choose where the light shines.
Eph 5:13 But all things that are reproved are made manifest by the light: for whatsoever doth make manifest is light.
One more thing. I can only imagine if this statement:
“ The Holy Spirit will not restrain.. He (the Holy Spirit)will not operate the way Jesus predicted He would in John’s gospel convicting the world of sin, of righteousness and judgement. (John 16:8)”
was quoted by David Nathan, I’ve no doubt that the torches would be flaming and the tar and feathers at the ready along with videos, articles and more. However it belongs to Jacob Prasch, he will have to own this one and how does he explain that Jesus’s prediction of the what the Holy Spirit does is wrong? Oh, no one in his camp is asking him to explain himself, nor his faithful followers. Thankful God woke us up a few years ago. Blessing to you Treena.
Having declared his “epiphany” just a few days ago, Bill Randles has reverted back to type and continues to drag David Nathan’s name through the mud!
JUST THREE DAYS LATER:
“Why There Is Still A Question… (David Nathan)
So what is my problem? Why haven’t I ‘forgiven ‘ him? *
- “ The blood of Jesus will not profit anyone anything in the Millennium” and the twin statement in which Nathan strongly asserts that the blood sacrifices offered in the Millennium are in no way memorial. In other words, they do not point back to the cross of Jesus, as the Lord’s Supper does.
- ” God the Father did not Create anything”...
Lets go over the facts again shall we?
David Nathan has explained that his statement about the Blood of Jesus was badly expressed and that he was not succinct etc. Could it be any clearer Bill Randles?
David Nathan: “The statement which I should not have made but rather should have sought to express myself very differently and that folk have objected to is, “The Blood of Jesus will not profit anyone, anything in the Millennium.” In using this phrase, which I regret, I was not stating that the Blood of Jesus does not cleanse in all ages as this would be a clear violation of scripture. His blood alone can take away sin and every sacrifice from Genesis 3:21, when the Lord clothed Adam and Eve in tunics of skin to the sacrifices of the Millennium all point to Jesus. In the teaching I kept using the word atone to describe the purpose of the millennial sacrifices in the sense that they do not remove sin but cover sin. I reiterate again that I do not teach nor believe that the sin of an animal or animals can ever remove sin. Not under the Old Testament, not now nor in the age to come. Only the Blood of Jesus can remove sin both now and forever, including the millennium. This is and has always been what I have believed though I did not express it succinctly in the series on Eschatology.”
David Nathan: “The bible is absolutely clear that God is the creator. The Father ordained creation. Jesus was the creator in perfect unity with the Father.. not that God the Father was not involved in creation..” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jGuCiRUvriM&t=851s
I am no apologist for David Nathan by any means, but I cannot stand idly by while complete distortions of the truth are employed in order to destroy another believer. Prasch and his sycophants will have to give an answer for their wicked behaviour in this matter. (Matthew 7:2).
In the meantime, although he has had a complete month to do so, Bill Randles hasn’t had time to examine Prasch’s dubious intra-seal teachings including “Counting the Omer”, and statements like “the Holy Spirit will not be in the world during the 70th week of Daniel”,“Pentecost is reversed”, etc. It would take perhaps an hour at the most for an experienced bible scholar/teacher to examine intra-seal and to find that it is utterly false. So what is the agenda?