Just recently released Bill Randles is caught on tape agreeing with David Nathan that the Blood of Christ atones for sin and is sufficient while discussing the Millennium Sacrifices in April of 2015.
This raises many question as Bill did say he had never heard David Nathan’s Millennial view before and did ask for further inquiry on the subject. David, as he has always maintained, stated that this view was not doctrine but simply his opinion. David has theorized that once Christ returns the age of grace is over and animal sacrifices are re-instituted in the Millennium. In this video they read passages from Zechariah chapter two and Ezekiel chapter forty where the one deals with the assembling of the Nations to Jerusalem and the other dealing with the sacrifices, namely, the sin offering and the trespass offering.
In my opinion, David Nathan never had a need for repentance as many times he stated his Millennial view was simply his opinion, he was simply theorizing. In fact, many theologians will tell you that we just don’t know the full impact of the meaning behind the Millennial sacrifices. Yet three years after this taping, Bill Randles aligned himself with Jacob Prasch in excommunicating David Nathan and labeling him a heretic and maintains his position to this day.
When David Nathan reached out for correction, stating he was willing to be corrected and repent of any wrong doctrine has been met with total silence by Moriel and Randles alike. His repentance has been rejected as Prasch and Randles it seems feel they are worthy to sit upon the judgment seat reading David’s heart.
You will notice in this video that Bill Randles never took issue with is view and even confirmed David’s belief in the sufficiency of Christ’s Blood. Clear the error has been and still is lays at the feel of David Nathan’s accusers. The video is below!