A note on the weak women in 2 Timothy 3:6-7 — Marg Mowczko

weak-willed silly women 2 Timothy 3

For among them are those [false teachers] who worm their way into households and take captive “weak-willed women” (gynaikaria) who are weighed down by sins, led by various passions, always learning and never able to come to a knowledge of the truth. 2 Timothy 3:6-7

UNDER-EDUCATED, SILLY WOMEN IN 2 TIMOTHY 3:6-7

I’ve seen people express dismay that Paul[1] disparages women in 2 Timothy 3:6-7. However, these verses are talking about a certain kind of woman—probably those stuck at home with little education and limited life experience, including experience in how to learn and discern. Paul is not talking about all women, or women in general, in these verses.

The usual Greek word for “women/wives” (gynaikes) is not used here, but a diminutive form, literally “little women” (gynaikaria). This diminutive form is an uncommon Greek word and doesn’t occur elsewhere in the New Testament. It can have a neutral sense, but Paul’s context indicates a negative sense. Accordingly, it is variously translated into English New Testaments as “weak women,” “vulnerable women,” “gullible women,” and even “silly women.” (Compare translations here.)

Furthermore, while the text doesn’t specify what kind of passions the women were indulging, a common trope or stereotype of the day was that men were better at controlling themselves than women, a stereotype perpetuated in the writings of men. Sometimes people live up to expectations and standards of stereotypes. Paul was not happy with the behaviour of this group of women.

STRONG CRITICISM FOR DEPRAVED MEN AND DUPED WOMEN

The passage where these verses come from is not primarily a criticism of weak-willed women, however, but of false teachers (and their many vices) who were infiltrating the Ephesian church (2 Tim. 3:1-9). Paul states that these people “resist the truth” and “They are men who are corrupt in mind and worthless in regard to the faith” (2 Tim. 3:8 CSB).[2] These treacherous men were manipulating simple-minded, easily-led women.[3]

Paul doesn’t hold back and is scathing in his criticism of both the false teachers and the women who have fallen for their deception. He is angry! And he wants Timothy and the Ephesian Church to know it!

Paul uses forceful language against the male teachers and their female students, but these words are no indication whatsoever of his general thoughts of men and women. There is no hint in his letters that Paul thought women were generally gullible, silly, or unable to learn,[4] or driven by unhealthy passions.

PAUL RESPECTED SENSIBLE AND GIFTED WOMEN

In other verses of the New Testament, we see that Paul respected women and that he valued and endorsed their ministries.

He planted a church in Lydia’s home. He introduced Phoebe to the church at Rome as his sister, as a minister (or deacon), as a patron of many, and he entrusted his letter to the Romans to her. He valued the ministries of Prisca, Euodia, and Syntyche as his coworkers in the gospel. He positively acknowledged the ministry labours of Mary of Rome, Tryphena, Tryphosa, and Persis—he loved Persis. He referred to Junia as a fellow Jew (or relative), his fellow prisoner, and as noteworthy among the apostles. Paul warmly mentions no less than ten women in Romans chapter 16.

There are still more women who Paul positively acknowledges in his letters. He took seriously a report from Chloe of Corinth’s people. He passed on greetings from Claudia of Rome, and sent greetings to Apphia of Colossae. He recognized the house church of Nympha in Laodicea and asked that greetings be passed on to her and her church. He respected the faith and teaching of Lois and Eunice.

Paul’s heated criticism of one group of women, the weak-willed women who were duped by male false teachers in Ephesus, doesn’t change the fact that he respected more sensible women and their abilities.


FOOTNOTES

[1] Many scholars believe 2 Timothy was written by an anonymous author writing in the name of Paul. However, I believe it was written by the apostle Paul.

[2] The context indicates the false teachers were all, or mostly, men.

[3] Gynaikaria/γυναικάρια (“weak women”) is grammatically accusative neuter plural in 1 Timothy 3:6, and the participles that mean 1. “weighed down,” 2. “being led,” 3. “[always] learning,” and 4. “[never] able” are all accusative neuter plural, and so they are describing the weak women. I’ve included this information because I’ve seen people incorrectly suggest these behaviours are descriptions of the male false teachers; the Greek grammar does not support this suggestion.

[4] The “weak women” (gynaikaria) in 2 Timothy 3:6-7 are distinct from “a woman” in 1 Timothy 2:11-15 who needed to learn and not teach, and also not domineer her husband. Paul thought this woman was capable of learning (1 Tim. 2:11).

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.